(Draft, Playground)
(Website)
Incubating:
#infographic (120) #nonduality (53) abiding (1) aging (1) ai – artificial intelligence (94) Anxiety (1) Aversion (1) Aware Being (3) Bible (2) Colors (1) Contentment (2) cross (1) Daoist (1) default (1) Devotion (1) Direct Knowing (2) Discernment (2) Divine (1) Effort (1) effortless (1) Ego (5) Eternal (2) Excalidraw (1) external link (6) Fascination (1) Fear (2) File Permissions (1) food (2) Freedom (2) GardenOfFriends.com (1) God (3) Google Drive (1) health (3) Heart (1) Holiday (43) I Am (1) identity (2) Inquiry (1) interview (1) Jungian psychoanalyst (1) liberation (1) Logic (1) longevity (1) Mathematics (1) Money (1) Movement (1) Mr-Jesus.com (7) music (3) mystic (1) namespace-Christian (2) Narcissism (1) No Attributes (1) Non-Duality (1) No Skin Line (1) Peace (2) Peopleing (1) Permeation (1) Peter Bunzl (1) Phantom I (2) post-trauma recovery specialist (1) Prior to Self (1) Prior to This (1) Pure Aware Being (2) Pure Being (6) Quote (2) Recognition (1) reggae (1) Resistance (2) restless mind (1) Rising I (5) Root (1) Science (1) Self-Love (1) Shadow (1) Shivashakti (1) Silence (2) speech (1) Stillness (1) stress (1) substack (52) suffering (2) Tao Te Ching (2) Techy (1) Temporal (1) thinkyness.com (15) this-world (1) Timeless Being (1) Togetherness (1) trampolin (1) Transparency (1) Trauma (1) via Brenda (1) via Kat (2) via Peter B (1) via ralph (31) via Russ (1) Vibration (1) video (22) Viveka (1) Words (1)
Sorry for the misleading video thumbnail.
The talk is very good:
“Listen, like you might be wrong”.
Step 3: Interrogate Yourself. Ask: Why do I believe this? You must often fight your own beliefs first before you can truly achieve understanding.
Holger: The why question remains in the realm of narratives. A more non-dual approach might be the inquiry: Who is aware of this? Or to add a little Byron Katie into the mix ❤️.
“Drawing from a diverse family heritage that spans three major faiths, the speaker argues that the antidote to a fractured society is understanding rather than agreement. He challenges the modern tendency to view the world through binary conflicts, noting that the goal of dialogue has shifted from learning to a desire to win or humiliate…
Leave a Reply